: Nélio Cacho,Thiago César, Thomas Filipe, Eliezio Soares, Arthur Cassio, Rafael Souza, Israel Garcia, Eiji Adachi Barbosa, Alessandro GarciaVenue
: International Conference on Software EngineeringDate
: 2014Type of Experiement
: Case StudySample Size
: 16Class/Experience Level
: ProfessionalParticipant Selection
: 16 software projects covering several domainsData Collection Method
: Code Metric, Project Artifact(s)
Exception handling mechanisms are believed to support robust and maintainable implementation of exception handling in software systems. Many modern languages are often claimed to have more appropriated exception handling mechanisms. This paper conducts an empirical study aimed at understanding the relationship between changes in C# programs and their robustness. These C# programs were analyzed by applying a change impact analysis and a control flow analysis in 119 versions of 16 C# programs.
The results showed that most of the problems hindering software robustness in those programs are caused by changes in the normal code. Many potential faults were introduced even when improving exception handling in C# code. Lastly, faults are often facilitated by the maintenance- driven flexibility of the exception handling mechanism.
In conclusion this study suggests that C# programmers often unconsciously traded robustness for maintainability in a wide range of program categories. The use of exception handling management in C# was very fragile and often led to robustness decrease. Programmers often introduced bugs when performing subtle changes in try blocks. A high number of uncaught exception flows were also introduced when the catch blocks were changed. These findings seem to indicate that there is still much room for improving built-in exception handling management in programming languages.